Maxine Waters Denied Entry at LA ICE Facility Amid Protests
On Sunday, June 8, amidst ongoing protests sparked by recent ICE raids in Los Angeles, Congresswoman Maxine Waters attempted to enter the Metropolitan Detention Center located in downtown L.A. Waters said she was going to check on David Huerta, the president of SEIU Local 99, who’d been detained by ICE during the raids. Video footage published by The Hindustan Times shows Waters in full congressional attire approaching the entrance, only to have the door sharply closed in her face .
Waters later told KNX News 97.1 FM she wore her jacket emblazoned with “United States Congress” and presented herself at the door, identifying her position and intent. The responding officer allegedly refused her entry, saying that only essential visitors were being allowed —though that remained vague .
According to coverage on KNX News & Audacy, this refusal marked a rare instance of a sitting member of Congress being denied physical access during a politically charged enforcement operation. The larger context involves federal, local, and National Guard presence—deployed under authority from President Donnaled Trump—in response to widespread ICE activity over the weekend .
Waters, known for her outspoken advocacy on immigration rights, later engaged with media outside the facility. She questioned the federal deployment’s intent, referencing earlier remarks attributed to President Trump about “shooting peaceful demonstrators” and raising concerns about militarized presence in a city designated as a sanctuary .
This incident brings into focus a deeper issue: congressional oversight versus operational discretion at federal detention sites. Under federal law, members of Congress are granted the right to unannounced visits to ICE facilities for oversight purposes—the same right exercised by New Jersey officials during a May visit to a Newark facility that escalated into confrontation .
For many in Black and immigrant communities, this moment carries added significance. It exemplifies how federal authority can erect barriers—literal and symbolic—even when the individuals involved hold elected power. Historically, these communities have experienced federal influence in the form of overpolicing, exclusion, and marginalization.
Waters’ attempt to enter was more than political theater. It was an effort to assert accountability at a time when families are being torn apart by detentions. It underscores the tension between the right to oversight and the practical barriers on the ground during crises.
As Los Angeles continues to grapple with the implications of ICE’s raids, and as national debate over federal intervention intensifies, this incident will likely draw scrutiny in Congress and prompt questions about access, transparency, and oversight.
For LA communities already entangled in immigration enforcement, Waters’ denied entry isn’t just symbolic—it mirrors the barriers they encounter when seeking justice, truth, and humanity. The moment may be viral. But the implications are real.